|
b. 1-4
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE the accents in the first four bars, just like in the practically entire piece, are short. It is an arbitrary change of the revisers. Long accents, most probably written by Chopin in [A], are present here only in FE. The first three accents of GE introduce a certain ambiguity, since their typeface is slightly different (they are narrower) than of the remaining marks in this source – perhaps they are also supposed to be interpreted as long. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 1-3
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In FE there are no separate fermatas for the octaves in the L.H. The marks were added by the revisers of GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
EE2 removed the dedication from the title page. It was returned already in EE3 and placed over the headline title. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications |
|||||
|
b. 5-11
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The missing quaver rest in the lowest voice in the L.H. most probably results from an inaccuracy of the Chopinesque notation of [A], repeated then in FE (→GE). We add this quaver rest; similarly, in bar 11. The rests in both bars were added also by the reviser of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 6-18
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The fingering in the entire EE is inauthentic, and it comes from the editor – on this page only for the R.H. in bars 6, 9 and 16-18. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
